The two algorithms are described as follows:
You may have to experiment with the two algorithms to obtain the optimal mesh. Figure 1 illustrates a simple shell region that was meshed with quadrilateral-dominated elements using the two meshing algorithms. In this example both algorithms generate an acceptable mesh. Figure 1. Both algorithms generate acceptable meshes.
Because the elements produced by the advancing front algorithm follow your seeds, the resulting mesh may include some skew in the elements in narrow regions. Element skew is illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 2. In some cases the advancing front algorithm generates elements with some skew.
In contrast, the advancing front algorithm may generate elements of a more uniform size with a more consistent aspect ratio, as shown in Figure 3. Uniform element size can play an important role in the analysis; for example, if you are creating a mesh for an Abaqus/Explicit analysis, small elements in the mesh can unduly control the size of the time step. In addition, if it is important that the elements follow your seeds, the advancing front algorithm is preferable. Figure 3. In some cases the advancing front algorithm produces a more uniform mesh.
In some cases, when you mesh multiple regions, Abaqus/CAE generates a mesh with sheared elements at the interface between regions. Nodes in one region may be positioned differently than nodes in an adjacent region, which results in shear at the common boundary when Abaqus/CAE merges the adjacent meshes. Figure 4 shows multiple swept regions and the resulting mesh generated by the medial axis algorithm. Figure 4. Mesh shear is significant between adjacent regions using the medial axis algorithm.
The advancing front algorithm positions the nodes on the source side at the same location as your seeds; as a result, the mesh shear will be reduced. Figure 5 shows the same part meshed with the same seeding using the advancing front algorithm. However, as stated earlier, you may have to experiment with the two algorithms to obtain the optimal mesh. Figure 5. Mesh shear is reduced between adjacent regions using the advancing front algorithm.
|