Tube support elements

Tube support elements model the interaction between a tube and a support that is not always in contact with the tube during dynamic events. The tube is assumed to have a circular section and can interact with one of two tube support geometries: a circular hole and an “egg-crate” support.

The following topics are discussed:

Related Topics
In Other Guides
Tube support elements

ProductsAbaqus/Standard

Two tube support interface elements are provided, one for each geometry, as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. As indicated in Figure 2, one cylindrical geometry interface is needed to model the interaction of the tube with a circular hole, while Figure 1 shows that several unidirectional geometry elements are needed to model the interaction with an egg-crate—one element perpendicular to each pair of egg-crate faces.

Figure 1. ITSUNI elements for tube/“egg-crate” support interaction.

Figure 2. ITSCYL element for tube/drilled hole support interaction.

The interface elements themselves consist of a spring and friction link and a dashpot, as shown in Figure 3. The spring is assumed to behave as shown in Figure 4: when there is no contact between the tube and the support, no force is transmitted by the spring; when the tube is in contact with the support, the force increases as the tube wall is deformed. This force can be modeled as a linear or a nonlinear function of the relative displacement between the axis of the tube and the center of the hole in the support.

Figure 3. Tube support element behavior.

Figure 4. Nonlinear spring behavior in ITS elements to model clearance and tube flattening.

The frictional part of the spring and friction link uses the Coulomb friction model in Abaqus: that model is described in Coulomb friction.

The dashpot is provided to model fluid effects in the annulus between the tube and the support plate. Its behavior can be linear or nonlinear. The model assumes that shear forces created by the fluid are negligible, so that the only shear forces transmitted by one of these interface elements are the frictional forces caused by direct contact between the tube and the support.

A major simplification in these elements that saves considerable computational effort in dynamic applications is the assumption that impacts between the tube and its support plates involve no instantaneous transfer of momentum or energy loss: the standard impact algorithm of Abaqus/Standard used with gap and other interface elements (and described in Intermittent contact/impact) is not needed. This simplification derives from the assumption that these elements will be used in conjunction with beam element models of the tube, so the tube section is defined by the position and orientation of its axis and local deformation of the cross-section of the tube is neglected. In reality, when the tube hits a support, initially only a small part of the tube wall loses momentum so that there is—instantaneously—only a small loss of kinetic energy. This instantaneous energy loss is neglected when these elements are used. The subsequent flattening of the tube wall is modeled by the spring link in the element, acting between the node on the tube axis and the node representing the center of the hole. Thus, the modeling of this local flattening behavior as an equivalent spring provides the simplification that instantaneous impact calculations are not needed. In cases where this approach is not reasonable, gap elements can be used instead of these special interface elements, at the cost of more computational effort.

The remainder of this section discusses the kinematic definitions used in these elements and their contributions to the overall equilibrium equations and to the Jacobian (stiffness) matrix needed in the Newton solution of those equations.